sammy knows what to say to get incurious venture capitalists to give him money

Maybe because he’s an idiot?

Millions.

Successful is debatable. There's no question he is financially successful, but he fails at every metric I personally measure success by: Honesty, integrity, loyalty, and kindness. I'm not saying my metric is the correct one by any means, just that the definnition of success varies across humanity.

I wonder how people have been doing it, since the beginning of time, with no help from technology.

Ya big fucking clown.

Edit:

Honestly bro what is it about tech bros being the biggest fucking losers on the face of this planet? I have more respect for street sweepers at this point

Anything is debatable. I could debate that the sky is not blue of if I wanted to. I’m debating you right now.

He is successful by the metrics in which society measures success and that’s all I meant by that.

Saying someone’s is successful is not a moral judgement or approval of their character. Sam Altman is successful, Elon Musk is successful, all of these billionaires that built companies that have changed the world for better or wrong are all successful. This in no way means that I’m saying they’re good people or even that they are people that should be emulated or any other sort of moral judgement.

Poor little human . I mean the baby

Someone who says this is not a fit parent and should have their children taken away from them.

That you, Sam?

Given what he's undoubtedly being paid, I'm sure hiring a nanny to look after his unfortunate offspring is well within his budget.

I’m not as anti AI as a lot of people here but trusting it with very important things is asking for trouble. It still randomly hallucinates and gives you bad info. Not as often as it used to but still not good enough to trust with your child’s health.

ChatGPT has taken my bread to the next level and helped me diagnose electronics problems way faster than I have figured out on my own, which is awesome. But it has also given me a blueberry muffin recipe with no wet ingredients and calculated bread hydration 10% too low. I can easily imagine a scenario where some tired parent asks it for a Motrin dose for an infant and gets a wildly wrong answer and injures their child.

Which he can afford because of ChatGPT. Checkmate.

Someone needs to Chat CPS.

Altman: How do i care for my child?

Chat GPT (condensed): You rich, hire a bitch.

If street sweepers went away, people would notice within a week or two.

If tech bros went away, we'd just enjoy not having tech bros.

It's like that one thing: "Who would you notice is gone first, the CEO or the janitor?"

Like many things, a tool is only as smart as the wielder. There's still a ton of critical thinking that needs to happen as you do something as simple as bake bread. Using an AI tool to suggest ingredients can be useful from a creative perspective, but should not be assumed accurate at face value. Raisins and Dill? maybe ¯\(ツ)/¯, haven't tried that one myself.

I like AI, for being able to add detail to things or act as a muse, but it cannot be trusted for anything important. This is why I'm 'anti-AI'. Too many people (especially in leadership roles) see this tool as a solution for replacing expensive humans with something that 'does the thinking'; but as we've seen elsewhere in this thread, AI CANT THINK. It only suggests items that are statistically likely to be next/near based on its input.

In the Security Operations space, we have a phrase "trust but verify". For anything AI, I would use 'doubt, then verify" instead. That all said. AI might very well give you a pointer to the place to ask how much motrin an infant should get. Hopefully, that's your local pediatrician.