Skip to content

Amazon boss tells staff AI means their jobs are at risk in coming years

Technology
71 52 197
  • 30 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    modernrisk@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    Which group? Israel government or US government?
  • video gen error

    Technology technology
    8
    2
    3 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    H
    Sorry what? You mean post to technology@lemmy.world?
  • 18 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    A
    This isn't the Cthulhu universe. There isn't some horrible truth ChatGPT can reveal to you which will literally drive you insane. Some people use ChatGPT a lot, some people have psychotic episodes, and there's going to be enough overlap to write sensationalist stories even if there's no causative relationship. I suppose ChatGPT might be harmful to someone who is already delusional by (after pressure) expressing agreement, but I'm not sure about that because as far as I know, you can't talk a person into or out of psychosis.
  • 112 Stimmen
    34 Beiträge
    122 Aufrufe
    fredselfish@lemmy.worldF
    Nlow that was a great show. I always wanted in on that too. Back when Radio Shack still dealt in parts for remote control cars.
  • 131 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    206 Aufrufe
    I
    Arcing causes more fires, because over current caused all the fires until we tightened standards and dual-mode circuit breakers. Now fires are caused by loose connections arcing, and damaged wires arcing to flammable material. Breakers are specifically designed for a sustained current, but arcing is dangerous because it tends to cascade, light arcing damages contacts, leading to more arcing in a cycle. The real danger of arcing is that it can happen outside of view, and start fires that aren't caught till everything burns down.
  • A Presence-sensing Drive For Securely Storing Secrets

    Technology technology
    9
    1
    18 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    36 Aufrufe
    D
    Isn't that arguably the nature of encryption, though? If you lose the key, you're SOL by design.
  • European Open Web Index goes public in June 2025

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    13 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.