Skip to content

Elon Musk’s A.I. Company Faces Lawsuit Over Gas-Burning Turbines |The company, xAI, has installed several dozen turbines in Memphis without proper permits, the group said, polluting a nearby community

Technology
17 13 6
  • 42 Stimmen
    28 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    T
    The poll, published by the research firm and the Walton Family Foundation... Walton Family Foundation provides financial support to The 74. What kind of fool would believe anything from these grifters? Phony AF at its face.
  • Fatphobia Is Fueled by AI-Created Images, Study Finds

    Technology technology
    14
    1
    15 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    56 Aufrufe
    K
    I pretty much agree. The only thing I would add is that it's not our place to tell others to lose weight or to point out their weight; people already know they are overweight and that it's unhealthy. We shouldn't be policing other people's bodies. It's also possible to be overweight and have body positivity; being overweight doesn't equate to being unattractive.
  • YouTube’s new anti-adblock measures

    Technology technology
    57
    217 Stimmen
    57 Beiträge
    193 Aufrufe
    M
    I wish I could create playlists on Nebula.
  • IRS tax filing software released to the people as free software

    Technology technology
    14
    288 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    38 Aufrufe
    P
    Only if you're a scumbag/useful idiot.
  • 19 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 2 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    quarterswede@lemmy.worldQ
    I give it 5 years before this is on our phones.
  • Unlock Your Computer With a Molecular Password

    Technology technology
    9
    1
    32 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    38 Aufrufe
    C
    One downside of the method is that each molecular message can only be read once, since decoding the polymers involves degrading them. New DRM just dropped. Imagine pouring rented movies into your TV like laundry detergent.
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.