Skip to content

Cloudflare CEO warns AI and zero-click internet are killing the web's business model

Technology
83 50 1.5k
  • Rockstar Games Plans Age Verification For GTA Online

    Technology technology
    88
    1
    336 Stimmen
    88 Beiträge
    204 Aufrufe
    T
    exactly what i am talking about. age restriction at the physical store kept you away for a while, while not forcing an alternative/underground market. however, if you knew the only way to get it is on an alternative store - you would immediately have looked there.
  • You can still enable uBlock Origin in Chrome, here is how

    Technology technology
    130
    1
    312 Stimmen
    130 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    W
    I use IronFox all the time. For me almost nothing is broken. Once a year I find one low value site that I have to load in Cromite to see what it is, and then I never use that trash site again. In other words, IronFox fulfills 100% of all my browsing needs excellently. I used Mull before IronFox, and my experience there was excellent as well. There is no good reason to use Chrome today or even some years back when Mull was the thing.
  • 41 Stimmen
    28 Beiträge
    393 Aufrufe
    T
    The poll, published by the research firm and the Walton Family Foundation... Walton Family Foundation provides financial support to The 74. What kind of fool would believe anything from these grifters? Phony AF at its face.
  • 69 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Trump extends TikTok ban deadline by another 90 days

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    24 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    65 Aufrufe
    N
    TikTacos
  • 324 Stimmen
    40 Beiträge
    473 Aufrufe
    P
    Jimmy Carter gave up his tiny peanut farm. Yet people nowadays are just incapable of understanding the concept of conflict of interest?
  • Tech Company Recruiters Sidestep Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 461 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.