Skip to content

American attitudes about AI today mirror poll answers about the rise of the internet in the '90s

Technology
78 41 682
  • The Age-Checked Internet Has Arrived

    Technology technology
    150
    1
    518 Stimmen
    150 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    Z
    Because it was meant as a "soft ban". First you make it troublesome to access porn, but also blame the providers if kids are circumventing it in any shape or form (no section 230-esque protections). This, alongside with payment processors, act as a chokehold on the industry, and also on the LGBTQIA+ community as a whole if you can read between the lines. The long game is to make it unpopular enough in a few years, that it can be easily outlawed.
  • 55 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    73 Aufrufe
    D
    Except AI would break everything so just watch the digital fires that are about to get started. They already figured a method to put malicious code in AI crawlers. Imagine you tell AI to code and it uses malware in the code.
  • 216 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    109 Aufrufe
    J
    It’s DEI’s fault!
  • The FDA Is Approving Drugs Without Evidence They Work

    Technology technology
    69
    1
    505 Stimmen
    69 Beiträge
    298 Aufrufe
    L
    Now you hit me curious too. This was my source on Texas https://www.texasalmanac.com/place-types/town Also the total number of total towns is over 4,000 with only 3k unincorporated, I did get the numbers wrong even in Texas. I had looked at Wikipedia but could not find totals, only lists
  • X launches E2E encrypted Chat

    Technology technology
    55
    2
    10 Stimmen
    55 Beiträge
    736 Aufrufe
    F
    So you do have evidence? Where is it?
  • Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans

    Technology technology
    34
    1
    205 Stimmen
    34 Beiträge
    404 Aufrufe
    M
    Well if they're collating data, not that difficult to add a new table for gun ownership.
  • Palantir Revisited: Who’s Us in Us vs. Them? | naked capitalism

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    15 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    191 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?