Skip to content

Brits can get around Discord's age verification thanks to Death Stranding's photo mode, bypassing the measure introduced with the UK's Online Safety Act. We tried it and it works—thanks, Kojima

Technology
64 36 0
  • Hitting the High Notes (2005)

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    12 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    T
    I always loved reading Joel's stuff, clear & well thought out. It was especially exciting when they were building Stack Overflow, but that's kinda got buried now. Things come & things go...
  • 0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    H
    Just to add — this survey is for literally anyone who's been through the project phase in college. We’re trying to figure out: What stops students from building cool stuff? What actually helps students finish a project? How mentors/teachers can support better? And whether buying/selling projects is something people genuinely do — and why. Super grateful to anyone who fills it. And if you’ve had an experience (good or bad) with your project — feel free to share it here too
  • 30 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    I
    That is a drive unit. The robot is bending down next to it wearing a vest.
  • 677 Stimmen
    179 Beiträge
    846 Aufrufe
    D
    Thats what the firewall rules do too, don't allow internet connection if there's no vpn connection. Firewall is a system-wide solution that always works, while qbt config relies heavily on the application implementing interface binding properly. Which it doesn't fully btw.
  • 846 Stimmen
    133 Beiträge
    579 Aufrufe
    A
    reminds me of the time when something with Amazon was Indian employees
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    421 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 4 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    66 Aufrufe
    guydudeman@lemmy.worldG
    Yeah, I don’t know how they’re doing it. They’re using some “zero trust” system. It’s beyond me.
  • 220 Stimmen
    99 Beiträge
    460 Aufrufe
    G
    In highrises with lots of stops and users, it uses some more advanced software to schedule the optimal stops, or distribute the load between multiple lifts. A similar concept exists for HDD controllers, where the read write arm must move to different positions to load data stored on different plates and sectors, and Repositioning the head is a slow and expensive process that cuts down the data transfer rate.