Skip to content

Re: Federation issues

Uncategorized
  • Confirmed.

    Uncategorized
    2
    1
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @atomicpoet@atomicpoet.org You can do the same on NodeBB as well
  • nodebb-widget-essentials

    Uncategorized
    4
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @Марк-Дакаскос they are not errors, you can ignore them.
  • Really loving #NodeBB so far.

    Uncategorized
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @deadsuperhero@social.wedistribute.org glad to hear it! I'm planning to continue working on improving our ActivityPub integration in 2025, hopefully with NLNet funding again
  • Yay!

    Uncategorized
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @deadsuperhero@social.wedistribute.org sorry it took so long to get around to it!
  • controversial protocol goals for a more conversational fedi:

    Uncategorized
    4
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @trwnh@mastodon.social correct. I suppose the easiest way to communicate permission would be that the thread deletion has to come from the context owner. In my case the context owner is a category, so it'd be federating out the deletion on behalf of the moderators.
  • upload button

    Uncategorized
    5
    2
    0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    baris@community.nodebb.orgB
    This is released as part of 4.0.5
  • FEP 7888 serving up an OrderedCollection

    Uncategorized
    34
    0 Stimmen
    34 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @trwnh@mastodon.social given that one way a context collection is discovered is via reference via a collection member itself, that's one way to define it. Admittedly, direct access to a context collection is also a legitimate use case (e.g. a NodeBB topic URL itself is the context collection), so something more explicit might be required.
  • 1b12 vs Guppe groups

    Uncategorized
    14
    0 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    > a PR to Mastodon @angus@socialhub.activitypub.rocks I would hold off on that in favour of a PR to introduce context serving and consumption (a la 7888). There are still some issues to work through, but I intend to have it upstreamed (via @frequency@frequency.app) once we settle on a semi-final implementation.