Skip to content

YouTube tops Disney and Netflix in TV viewing

Technology
96 61 339
  • How Apple’s iOS 26 and Google’s Android 16 Will Change Our Phones

    Technology technology
    17
    8 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    adespoton@lemmy.caA
    The one thing I’m continually annoyed about though is battery management. Why, in this day and age, do we not have a smartphone that can last on a single charge for a week? Instead, after a year or two of use, the devices with a glued in battery can barely last 8 hours on a charge. Doesn’t seem all that smart.
  • Why do AI company logos look like buttholes?

    Technology technology
    5
    1
    36 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    38 Aufrufe
    ivanafterall@lemmy.worldI
    It's a nascent industry standard called The Artificial Intelligence Network Template, or TAINT.
  • 206 Stimmen
    34 Beiträge
    219 Aufrufe
    remotelove@lemmy.caR
    I looked into that and the only question I really have is how geographically distributed the samples were. Other than that, It was an oversampled study, so <50% of the people were the control, of sorts. I don't fully understand how the sampling worked, but there is a substantial chart at the bottom of the study that shows the full distribution of responses. Even with under 1000 people, it seems legit.
  • 263 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    122 Aufrufe
    glitchvid@lemmy.worldG
    Republicans are the biggest suckers there are. There's a reason as soon as the jig is up grifters pivot to conservative talking points.
  • 150 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    135 Aufrufe
    D
    I played around the launch and didn't realize there were bots (outside of pve)... But I also assumed I was shooting a bunch of kids that barely understood the controls.
  • 45 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    43 Aufrufe
    artocode404@lemmy.dbzer0.comA
    Googlebot sad when disallowed access to 18+ videos
  • 22 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.