Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Pine64
  3. ROCKPro64
  4. ROCKPro64 - USB-C -> HDMi

ROCKPro64 - USB-C -> HDMi

ROCKPro64
  • FrankMF

    Heute mal nach langer Zeit wieder mal was ausprobiert, was ich schon lange machen wollte aber ich den Adapter nie gefunden habe 😉

    Ein USB-C nach HDMI Adapter angeschlossen und meinen 4K-Monitor von ASUS. Und was sehen ich, die Konsolen Ausgabe erscheint auf dem Monitor.

    IMG_20190507_181236_ergebnis.jpg

    Am WE mal mit einem Desktop Linux ausprobieren.

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0
  • H

    Könnten sie mir eine anleitung machen wie man dass schaft

    0
  • FrankMF

    @hannescam Hallo! Das ist ja schon ein paar Tage her, gut das wir den Screenshot haben. Du könntest genau diese Kernel-Version vom Kamil suchen und benutzen. Da musste man kein Linux Held sein, Kable einstecken - Bild da.

    Ob das mit was Aktuellerem geht, weiß ich nicht. Debian kann man ja so installieren, wie findest Du hier im Forum. Ob Debian die USB-C Schnittstelle nutzt weiß ich nicht. muss man ausprobieren.

    Da für mich die Platinen immer nur ohne Desktop Sinn gemacht haben, habe ich so was immer nur ganz kurz angetestet. Nutze die SOCs eigentlich ausschließlich Headless.

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0

  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - Projekt Wireguard Server

    Verschoben ROCKPro64
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    445 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Hat ein wenig Nerven gekostet und der Artikel ist auch was länger geworden 🙂 Viel Spaß beim Lesen und testen!

  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - WLan-Antennen

    Hardware
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    262 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - Armbian - Schnelltest 5.75 Debian Stretch

    Armbian
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    376 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    Neues Script "change-default-kernel.sh "

    ROCKPro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    583 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro WLan Modul

    Verschoben ROCKPro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    689 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    Bionic Minimal 0.7.7 - Vergleich 4.4.132 & 4.18.0-rc3-1046

    Verschoben Archiv
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    572 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    DTS DTB Files bearbeiten

    Angeheftet ROCKPro64
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Oder, ganz einfach

    sudo dtedit

    🙂

  • FrankMF

    stretch-minimal-rockpro64

    Verschoben Linux
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    982 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Mal ein Test was der Speicher so kann.

    rock64@rockpro64:~/tinymembench$ ./tinymembench tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency) ========================================================================== == Memory bandwidth tests == == == == Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes == == Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be == == copied per second (adding together read and writen == == bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) == == Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer == == to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the == == destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) == == Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in == == brackets == ========================================================================== C copy backwards : 2812.7 MB/s C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2811.9 MB/s C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2632.8 MB/s C copy : 2667.2 MB/s C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2633.5 MB/s C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2640.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy : 2509.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2431.6 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2424.1 MB/s C fill : 4887.7 MB/s (0.5%) C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 4883.0 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 4889.3 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 4889.2 MB/s --- standard memcpy : 2807.3 MB/s standard memset : 4890.4 MB/s (0.3%) --- NEON LDP/STP copy : 2803.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 2802.1 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 2800.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2745.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2745.8 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2801.9 MB/s NEON STP fill : 4888.9 MB/s (0.3%) NEON STNP fill : 4850.1 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy : 2803.8 MB/s ARM STP fill : 4893.0 MB/s (0.5%) ARM STNP fill : 4851.7 MB/s ========================================================================== == Framebuffer read tests. == == == == Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, == == typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. == == Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much == == slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of == == CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. == == == == Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, == == accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, == == PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. == == == == If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s == == or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer == == is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall == == performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX == == uses this trick. == ========================================================================== NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 602.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 551.6 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 667.1 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 605.6 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 445.3 MB/s ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 428.8 MB/s ========================================================================== == Memory latency test == == == == Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers == == of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant == == are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM == == accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see == == page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every == == memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience == == this effect to its fullest). == == == == Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to == == be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache == == latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. == == Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing == == two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if == == the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding == == requests, dual random read has the same timings as two == == single reads performed one after another. == ========================================================================== block size : single random read / dual random read 1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 65536 : 4.5 ns / 7.2 ns 131072 : 6.8 ns / 9.7 ns 262144 : 9.8 ns / 12.8 ns 524288 : 11.4 ns / 14.7 ns 1048576 : 16.0 ns / 22.6 ns 2097152 : 114.0 ns / 175.3 ns 4194304 : 161.7 ns / 219.9 ns 8388608 : 190.7 ns / 241.5 ns 16777216 : 205.3 ns / 250.5 ns 33554432 : 212.9 ns / 255.5 ns 67108864 : 222.3 ns / 271.1 ns