X launches E2E encrypted Chat
-
“Early access” currently but I don’t pay for X or anything and it’s there for me. This comes after X were criticised and had all sorts of “backdoor” conspiracy theories being pushed after they took their private encrypted DMs offline the other day to add improvements.
Sure as hell wouldn't trust it unless they publish their trust system docs and verification tools.
-
“Early access” currently but I don’t pay for X or anything and it’s there for me. This comes after X were criticised and had all sorts of “backdoor” conspiracy theories being pushed after they took their private encrypted DMs offline the other day to add improvements.
The question is whether this actually is E2EE, as it's easy to fake by using a man in the middle attack and hard to prove. The only real way to prove it for sure is to run a third party security audit, like Signal does.
Taking down the old system doesn't inspire confidence either, as this downtime could easily been used to interrupt old conversations in order to implement a way to decrypt the messages on the servers before passing it on to the actual recipient, as all keys would have to be re-issued.
-
Sure as hell wouldn't trust it unless they publish their trust system docs and verification tools.
Even then, lots of other options.....
-
“Early access” currently but I don’t pay for X or anything and it’s there for me. This comes after X were criticised and had all sorts of “backdoor” conspiracy theories being pushed after they took their private encrypted DMs offline the other day to add improvements.
Somehow I don't believe them.
-
“Early access” currently but I don’t pay for X or anything and it’s there for me. This comes after X were criticised and had all sorts of “backdoor” conspiracy theories being pushed after they took their private encrypted DMs offline the other day to add improvements.
Maybe the mods should add another rule to the sidebar saying only negative X posts are allowed, since that's clearly all the "community" wants lol.
The fact this is being treated as bad news is unbelievable.
-
Sure as hell wouldn't trust it unless they publish their trust system docs and verification tools.
With recent advances, there is nothing released online that can be believed. A. I fakes are everywhere and in everything
So I wouldn't trust them even then.
-
With recent advances, there is nothing released online that can be believed. A. I fakes are everywhere and in everything
So I wouldn't trust them even then.
Untrue. Many Zero-Trust platforms out there that give you the tools to confirm when you are in fact e2e encrypted. They publish their docs, open source their tools, and give verification tools to check.
-
“Early access” currently but I don’t pay for X or anything and it’s there for me. This comes after X were criticised and had all sorts of “backdoor” conspiracy theories being pushed after they took their private encrypted DMs offline the other day to add improvements.
Haha! Yeah, sure it is.
-
Untrue. Many Zero-Trust platforms out there that give you the tools to confirm when you are in fact e2e encrypted. They publish their docs, open source their tools, and give verification tools to check.
Anything, even your tools can be faked. Anything. You may not like it, and for the most part most mundane data isn't worth faking, but there's no real way to trust any online anymore
Go ahead kids, downvote
But prove I'm wrong. Show me where any number reported by anything online cannot be faked. Show me.
You can't , because if there's money, it's being done.
Just like trump will never become president, the overconfident tech bros and ketamine junkies will never be able to get your encrypted data. Sure. Believe that.
-
Maybe the mods should add another rule to the sidebar saying only negative X posts are allowed, since that's clearly all the "community" wants lol.
The fact this is being treated as bad news is unbelievable.
I think it's because many people (including me) doubt it's actually private and secure. The last thing you should ever trust xitter with is your privacy and security. If it actually is private and secure, that's great
-
Anything, even your tools can be faked. Anything. You may not like it, and for the most part most mundane data isn't worth faking, but there's no real way to trust any online anymore
Go ahead kids, downvote
But prove I'm wrong. Show me where any number reported by anything online cannot be faked. Show me.
You can't , because if there's money, it's being done.
Just like trump will never become president, the overconfident tech bros and ketamine junkies will never be able to get your encrypted data. Sure. Believe that.
There wasn't any in the first place, fundamentally.
-
Anything, even your tools can be faked. Anything. You may not like it, and for the most part most mundane data isn't worth faking, but there's no real way to trust any online anymore
Go ahead kids, downvote
But prove I'm wrong. Show me where any number reported by anything online cannot be faked. Show me.
You can't , because if there's money, it's being done.
Just like trump will never become president, the overconfident tech bros and ketamine junkies will never be able to get your encrypted data. Sure. Believe that.
Riiiight. First time I'm hearing of network traffic being faked. You must be blowing the lid off of something HUGE here
-
Riiiight. First time I'm hearing of network traffic being faked. You must be blowing the lid off of something HUGE here
You're not as smart as you think.
everything can be spoofed. Hell your comment could be.
Network traffic is faked all the time
Hell that article is a year old, so your info is a bit dated.
You have a good evening
-
There wasn't any in the first place, fundamentally.
Fair enough
-
“Early access” currently but I don’t pay for X or anything and it’s there for me. This comes after X were criticised and had all sorts of “backdoor” conspiracy theories being pushed after they took their private encrypted DMs offline the other day to add improvements.
Who holds the encryption keys? If it's X/Twiiter, I wouldn't trust it at all, especially considering who owns it.
-
“Early access” currently but I don’t pay for X or anything and it’s there for me. This comes after X were criticised and had all sorts of “backdoor” conspiracy theories being pushed after they took their private encrypted DMs offline the other day to add improvements.
-
You're not as smart as you think.
everything can be spoofed. Hell your comment could be.
Network traffic is faked all the time
Hell that article is a year old, so your info is a bit dated.
You have a good evening
I'm confused about this conversation. Are you the idiot here, or do you think I am?
Your AI generated article doesn't have any actual information, doesn't deal with MITM attacks, and has zero context about how anything it mentions could be used to attack what we're discussing here.
Unless you have a quantum responder in the chain, there isn't a currently known way to fake an exchange of keys to infiltrate secure channels secured by keys.
Not only would this destroy the currently existing Internet, you'd be seeing floods of information exfilateates for sale on the black market.
Not only have you not contributed to this conversation, you've proven to be absolutely ignorant about the topic, and you are awarded no points.
God have mercy on your soul.
-
“Early access” currently but I don’t pay for X or anything and it’s there for me. This comes after X were criticised and had all sorts of “backdoor” conspiracy theories being pushed after they took their private encrypted DMs offline the other day to add improvements.
I dont buy the security of that shit for a second.
-
Who holds the encryption keys? If it's X/Twiiter, I wouldn't trust it at all, especially considering who owns it.
The guy who champions free speech?
-
I think it's because many people (including me) doubt it's actually private and secure. The last thing you should ever trust xitter with is your privacy and security. If it actually is private and secure, that's great
What are you basing your doubts on? When has X under Musk had anything happen to doubt their encryption? You think the guy fighting for free speech and ending people getting in trouble for what they say is going to lie about this?
-
-
‘I blame Facebook’: Aaron Sorkin is writing a Social Network sequel for the post-Zuckerberg era
Technology1
-
Supreme Court (SCOTUS) upholds a Texas law that requires porn websites to verify that their visitors are 18 or older, rejecting a First Amendment challenge to the law
Technology1
-
-
VPN Registrations Increase by 1,000%, less than Hour After PornHub Blocked France From Accessing its Website.
Technology1
-
-
-